Insecure Avoidant Attachment: A Closer Look (Part 4 of 6) {EP 37}
Keep reading or listen on the podcast!
What’s it been like to marinate on the idea that insecure attachment isn’t bad or wrong?
Not sure what I’m talking about? Back up one blog post to Insecure Anxious Attachment: A Closer Look.
The way our minds adapt to not getting our attachment needs met (to be seen, soothed, safe, and secure) is nothing short of amazing.
What emerges from insecure attachment is protective.
But it isn’t without cost.
Can we allow both to be true? There is nothing wrong with insecure attachment. It’s brilliant. At the same time, the protectors we develop in order to survive when we aren’t getting our needs met mean we are hiding away our real, true selves. And yes, this has a cost.
So it can be true that there is nothing wrong with the parts of us that hold insecure attachment while also being true that we want to find new ways of being in relationship so that our real, true selves can emerge.
Let’s review a few of my non-negotiables when exploring insecure attachment
- Attachment, as you may remember from The Basics of Attachment, is about physical and emotional survival.
- Babies first need their caregivers to be present and regulated in order to simply just keep them alive.
- But babies also need their caregivers to be present and regulated so the baby can become themselves!
Connection and Autonomy
Remember from The Basics of Attachment I talked about how attachment has two complementary forces? Connection and autonomy?
Babies who develop insecure-avoidant attachment struggle with the connection side.
As babies need co-regulation to organize their feelings or to refill their connection cup, caregivers with avoidant attachment tend to get overwhelmed (though they rarely notice this, because the neurobiology of avoidant attachment often leads to a lack of noticing), sending nonverbal cues to the baby that the baby’s needs are too much. The baby figures this out quickly, and because their primary concern is keeping their caregiver regulated so that they can experience being seen, secure, soothed, and safe as much as possible, learns how to ignore and downregulate the connection side of their attachment needs.
As these babies grow, they become toddlers and preschoolers who appear to have limited connection needs. They appear independent, and maybe cool, calm, and collected. They may also have limitations in empathy, cooperation, and creating close emotional connection with others.
A Venn Diagram of avoidant attachment might look something like this:
There is very little resonant, alive, and embodied ‘we’ space.
A Brilliant Adaptation!
Parents and caregivers with their own neurobiology of insecure avoidant attachment (actually in adults it’s called dismissive but we’re sticking with the same terminology here to decrease confusion with an already confusing enough topic) have a very hard time being emotionally and energetically present with their babies, especially when their babies need them.
These parents and caregivers learned themselves at a very very young age that feelings felt bad. They didn’t get the co-regulation they needed when they were small; in fact, they learned that turning to their caregiver with an expectation of co-regulation caused their caregiver to do the opposite- their caregiver would emotionally retreat, maybe while offering the physical care the baby needed (a bottle!) but without emotional presence, resonance, or co-regulation.
Avoidant attachment falls in the organized category of attachment so we know that these babies developed an organized, predictable way of coping with their caregiver’s inability to be present and provide co-regulation.
They stopped asking.
They stopped expressing emotional needs.
They stopped even realizing they had them.
They learned to be very autonomous.
Impact on Regulation
On the outside looking in, these babies and children may look like they have exceptional self-regulation.
It’s just an illusion. This attachment adaptation involves down-regulating their attachment needs and figuring out how to soothe themselves. Unfortunately, it’s not real soothing because soothing comes first from co-regulation.
Babies and children who are categorized as having insecure avoidant attachment are sometimes described as mature and independent. They often aren’t very emotionally reactive- until they are and then it tends to be in an explosion of rage.
Remember, of course, that the primary goal of these attachment adaptations is for the baby to keep their caregiver regulated enough that they can get as much safe, seen, soothed, and secure as possible. The strategy of insecure avoidant is to keep their caregivers regulated by not turning toward them for emotional support, connection, or co-regulation.
These babies have a hard time feeling their caregivers as a safe haven- a place to flee when they are overwhelmed and need their feelings organized.
They look like babies who don’t have a lot of needs- but this is just an illusion.
They have a lot of needs because humans have a lot of needs. Especially emotionally. Especially babies.
We know now that these babies still have the needs–they have the distress that typically prompts a baby to cry. They don’t, however, NOTICE these needs. They don’t feel the distress that does indeed exist.
It’s almost like the highway of information and sensation from the body to the brain has a traffic jam.
These babies and children ‘miscue’ their caregivers into believing they have very few emotional needs. (Miscue is language borrowed from The Circle of Security).
It’s a miscue though. We know that they actually do have a lot of emotional needs because they are, well, human. And a baby.
Maybe you’re thinking “Uh….so what’s the drawback here?”
Having emotional needs and experiences is just about the most glorious part of being human. If we spend a lot of energy trying to dissociate or ignore that reality, we lose some of our ability to be relationally connected to others.
Insecure avoidant attachment can lead to a decrease in empathy. It’s hard enough to make a mental map of their own experience, let alone someone else’s.
Cutting off the felt sense of having needs because it’s too painful to have needs and have them go unmet is brilliant.
And just like in anxious attachment, it isn’t without costs.
Once again, can we hold these two seemingly conflicting truths in mind at once?
- Attachment adaptations are brilliant.
- Attachment can change.
Hope and Expectation
There is always the hope that someone will finally see our true selves. Finally see our needs as valid, worthy, and not too much or too overwhelming.
There is always hope that someone will want to be with us in times of distress. That someone loves and adores those parts of us, too- not just the often high-performing “I have no need!!!” parts of us.
We all want all of our parts to be loved and adored.
Simultaneously, though, we also hold with this hope the expectation that our needs will not get met. We behave in ways that match our expectations and then evoke from others exactly what we expect and not what we hope- that our needs aren’t seen and don’t matter and we’re expected to make it through my emotional life all on our own.
Pockets of Attachment Memory
As we learn about attachment, our own pockets of insecure attachment often start to stir and come alive. We start to feel these experiences of attachment in our own neurobiology because we all have had experiences of insecure attachment- even if we primarily had secure attachment experiences and caregivers with a secure state of mind. Because none of us experience perfect attunement and co-regulation. None of us experienced being seen, soothed, secure and safe 100% of the time.
I’m wondering if you’re noticing that reading this blog feels a little different than reading the blog on anxious attachment? Maybe it feels boring? A little flat? Oftentimes, just learning about avoidant attachment can lead to a decrease in resonance, maybe even a little emptiness– because the neurobiology of avoidant attachment is a little bit of emptiness or nothingness. My mentor Bonnie Badenoch (stay tuned for a podcast interview with Bonnie!!!) describes the felt sense of avoidant attachment as ‘an emotional desert.’
Again, this is a brilliant adaptation.
I’m going to end this blog the same way I ended the blog on anxious attachment. Literally- I’m copying and pasting :)
Attachment is quite stable throughout our lives unless with are lucky enough to get into close relationship with someone who is able to offer us experiences of secure attachment OR if we are lucky enough to become aware of our attachment expectations and then start to put in the hard work to shift them.
There is always hope.
Promise.
Free eBook- Brilliance of Attachment
This is part 4 of 6 in a month-long series all about attachment- getting back to the basics. What is attachment? What is secure versus insecure? Why does it matter? How does attachment develop? And ultimately then- how do we change it???
You can keep reading on my blog and listening on my podcast.
I’d also love to send you the F R E E eBook I created based on this series. With the eBook, you’ll have the entire series in one, downloadable PDF you can store on your device, print, and access whenever you want. It’s beautiful (and it’s not just me that thinks so! I keep getting emails from folks swooning over the gorgeous design- which I did not do myself!)
Just let me know below the email address where you’d like me to send it!
Robyn
Don’t forget to check out this week’s podcast all about attachment, too! You can listen to the podcast directly on my website HERE or search for Parenting after Trauma wherever you listen to podcasts- iTunes, Google Podcast, Stitcher, Spotify, and more!
The Club will be opening for new members this fall! Grab your spot on the waiting list now!
- Gratitude for Our Watchdog & Possum Parts {EP 200} - November 19, 2024
- Scaffolding Relational Skills as Brain Skills with Eileen Devine {EP 199} - November 12, 2024
- All Behavior Makes Sense {EP 198} - October 8, 2024
This post was super helpful. I can see this type of attachment in one of our kids. He is an amazing kid. Thanks for helping me to see his attachment not as a horrible thing but as the way he adapted. I’m eager to see what else we can do to meet him where he is at.
Hey Jill! So glad the post was helpful! I’m positive he is indeed an amazing kid :) Next Wednesday the series will wrap up with a kinda ‘now what!’ blog/podcast. I look forward to hearing what you think of that!
This Avoidant Insecure Attachment mostly describes me and my oldest daughter and our small sensory overload buckets fill quickly as well. The Anxious Insecure Attachment is definitely my youngest daughter and her large leaking sensory bucket is definitely always needing contributions. It is a struggle most days for my two kids to get along and I definitely struggle parenting. I look forward to hear more about it, hope it helps me unlock some clues of our inter-relationships and how to regulate appropriately.
Thanks for this wonderful series on attachment. I hope you will address the effect of moving babies from an orphanage to an adoptive family mid babyhood. Institutionalization creates developmental trauma, as can the move from birth mother to orphanage and orphanage to adoptive family. In these cases the eventual primary caregivers are not present during some of these powerful adverse experiences and don’t yet have any relationship with the baby at the moment of adoption. From the baby’s point of view, adoptive parents appear out of nowhere, and everything about their world changes in a confusing flash. The parents’ attachment styles meet the baby’s, which are based on experiences of de facto neglect. The parents cannot erase those earlier experiences, but they can provide corrective ones. Yet the baby’s implicit memory never forgets that everything they are used to can go poof in an instant. Can you address the long-term attachment implications of these ACEs?